[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7609758.aa4.182330f18b8.Coremail.slark_xiao@163.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:53:23 +0800 (CST)
From: "Slark Xiao" <slark_xiao@....com>
To: "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "Alexandra Winter" <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] s390/qeth: Fix typo 'the the' in comment
At 2022-07-23 02:55:36, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:23:06 +0200 Alexandra Winter wrote:
>> On 22.07.22 11:38, Slark Xiao wrote:
>> > Replace 'the the' with 'the' in the comment.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Slark Xiao <slark_xiao@....com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
>> > index 9e54fe76a9b2..35d4b398c197 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
>> > @@ -3565,7 +3565,7 @@ static void qeth_flush_buffers(struct qeth_qdio_out_q *queue, int index,
>> > if (!atomic_read(&queue->set_pci_flags_count)) {
>> > /*
>> > * there's no outstanding PCI any more, so we
>> > - * have to request a PCI to be sure the the PCI
>> > + * have to request a PCI to be sure the PCI
>> > * will wake at some time in the future then we
>> > * can flush packed buffers that might still be
>> > * hanging around, which can happen if no
>>
>> This trivial typo has been sent twice already to this mailinglist:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Ytb1%2FuU+jlcI4jXw@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com/T/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/7a935730-f3a5-0b1f-2bdc-a629711a3a01@linux.ibm.com/t/
>
>Some of the comment spelling fixes get nacked in bulk (e.g. the
>previous one was sent with a date of three days prior to the actual
>posting). Since they are not in a thread the nacks are hard to see.
>Or maybe they got lost 'cause patchwork does not understand
>drivers/s390/net is netdev. Anyway, this one looks good, so it will
>likely go in.
Yes, I just updated my local linux-next thread. So it's hard to know whether other thread has applied such patches.
It needs time to merge changes between different threads. Especially for some non-fixes commit.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists