netdev - Re: [net-next: PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix speed setting for CPU/DSA ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:21:44 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix speed setting for
 CPU/DSA ports

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 02:18:45AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> I can of course apply both suggestions, however, I am wondering if I
> should resend them at all, as Russell's series is still being
> discussed. IMO it may be worth waiting whether it makes it before the
> merge window - if not, I can resend this patch after v5.20-rc1,
> targetting the net branch. What do you think?

I just don't want a fix for a known regression to slip through the cracks.
You can resend whenever you consider, but I believe that if you do so now
(today or in the following few days), you won't conflict with anybody's work,
considering that this has been said:

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:57:20PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Well, at this point, I'm just going to give up with this kernel cycle.
> It seems impossible to get this sorted. It seems impossible to move
> forward with the conversion of Marvell DSA to phylink_pcs.