netdev - [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] s390/ism: Cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220726100330.75191-3-wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:03:28 +0200
From:   Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] s390/ism: Cleanups

From: Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>

Reworked signature of the function to retrieve the system EID: No plausible
reason to use a double pointer. And neither to pass in the device as an
argument, as this identifier is by definition per system, not per device.
Plus some minor consistency edits.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c | 11 +++++------
 include/net/smc.h          |  2 +-
 net/smc/smc_ism.c          |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c b/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
index 5f7e28de8b15..4665e9a0e048 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
@@ -409,20 +409,19 @@ static void ism_create_system_eid(void)
 	memcpy(&SYSTEM_EID.type, tmp, 4);
 }
 
-static void ism_get_system_eid(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u8 **eid)
+static u8 *ism_get_system_eid(void)
 {
-	*eid = &SYSTEM_EID.seid_string[0];
+	return SYSTEM_EID.seid_string;
 }
 
 static u16 ism_get_chid(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
 {
-	struct ism_dev *ismdev;
+	struct ism_dev *ism = (struct ism_dev *)smcd->priv;
 
-	ismdev = (struct ism_dev *)smcd->priv;
-	if (!ismdev || !ismdev->pdev)
+	if (!ism || !ism->pdev)
 		return 0;
 
-	return to_zpci(ismdev->pdev)->pchid;
+	return to_zpci(ism->pdev)->pchid;
 }
 
 static void ism_handle_event(struct ism_dev *ism)
diff --git a/include/net/smc.h b/include/net/smc.h
index 37f829d9c6e5..1868a5014dea 100644
--- a/include/net/smc.h
+++ b/include/net/smc.h
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct smcd_ops {
 	int (*move_data)(struct smcd_dev *dev, u64 dmb_tok, unsigned int idx,
 			 bool sf, unsigned int offset, void *data,
 			 unsigned int size);
-	void (*get_system_eid)(struct smcd_dev *dev, u8 **eid);
+	u8* (*get_system_eid)(void);
 	u16 (*get_chid)(struct smcd_dev *dev);
 };
 
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ism.c b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
index c656ef25ee4b..e51c0cdff8e0 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_ism.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ int smcd_register_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
 	if (list_empty(&smcd_dev_list.list)) {
 		u8 *system_eid = NULL;
 
-		smcd->ops->get_system_eid(smcd, &system_eid);
+		system_eid = smcd->ops->get_system_eid();
 		if (system_eid[24] != '0' || system_eid[28] != '0') {
 			smc_ism_v2_capable = true;
 			memcpy(smc_ism_v2_system_eid, system_eid,
-- 
2.35.2