netdev - Re: [net PATCH 1/2] octeontx2-pf: cn10k: Fix egress ratelimit configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:04:32 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, sgoutham@...vell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 1/2] octeontx2-pf: cn10k: Fix egress ratelimit
 configuration

Hello,

On Sun, 2022-07-24 at 13:51 +0530, Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> 
> NIX_AF_TLXX_PIR/CIR register format has changed from OcteonTx2
> to CN10K. CN10K supports larger burst size. Fix burst exponent
> and burst mantissa configuration for CN10K.
> 
> Also fixed 'maxrate' from u32 to u64 since 'police.rate_bytes_ps'
> passed by stack is also u64.
> 
> Fixes: e638a83f167e ("octeontx2-pf: TC_MATCHALL egress ratelimiting offload")
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>

I wrongly applied this series to net-next due to PEBKAC here. I'm going
to rever it and apply to net.

I'm sorry for the confusion,

Paolo