[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fe0a59f83eaf63659cfd33600945f0886698c77.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:04:32 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, sgoutham@...vell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 1/2] octeontx2-pf: cn10k: Fix egress ratelimit
configuration
Hello,
On Sun, 2022-07-24 at 13:51 +0530, Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
>
> NIX_AF_TLXX_PIR/CIR register format has changed from OcteonTx2
> to CN10K. CN10K supports larger burst size. Fix burst exponent
> and burst mantissa configuration for CN10K.
>
> Also fixed 'maxrate' from u32 to u64 since 'police.rate_bytes_ps'
> passed by stack is also u64.
>
> Fixes: e638a83f167e ("octeontx2-pf: TC_MATCHALL egress ratelimiting offload")
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
I wrongly applied this series to net-next due to PEBKAC here. I'm going
to rever it and apply to net.
I'm sorry for the confusion,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists