[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220727080609.26532-1-hbh25y@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:06:09 +0800
From: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, kuniyu@...zon.co.jp,
richard_siegfried@...temli.org, joannelkoong@...il.com,
socketcan@...tkopp.net, gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk,
tomasz@...belny.oswiecenia.net
Cc: dccp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dccp: put dccp_qpolicy_full() and dccp_qpolicy_push() in the same lock
In the case of sk->dccps_qpolicy == DCCPQ_POLICY_PRIO, dccp_qpolicy_full
will drop a skb when qpolicy is full. And the lock in dccp_sendmsg is
released before sock_alloc_send_skb and then relocked after
sock_alloc_send_skb. The following conditions may lead dccp_qpolicy_push
to add skb to an already full sk_write_queue:
thread1--->lock
thread1--->dccp_qpolicy_full: queue is full. drop a skb
thread1--->unlock
thread2--->lock
thread2--->dccp_qpolicy_full: queue is not full. no need to drop.
thread2--->unlock
thread1--->lock
thread1--->dccp_qpolicy_push: add a skb. queue is full.
thread1--->unlock
thread2--->lock
thread2--->dccp_qpolicy_push: add a skb!
thread2--->unlock
Fix this by moving dccp_qpolicy_full.
Fixes: 871a2c16c21b ("dccp: Policy-based packet dequeueing infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
---
net/dccp/proto.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dccp/proto.c b/net/dccp/proto.c
index eb8e128e43e8..1a0193823c82 100644
--- a/net/dccp/proto.c
+++ b/net/dccp/proto.c
@@ -736,11 +736,6 @@ int dccp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
lock_sock(sk);
- if (dccp_qpolicy_full(sk)) {
- rc = -EAGAIN;
- goto out_release;
- }
-
timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, noblock);
/*
@@ -773,6 +768,11 @@ int dccp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
if (rc != 0)
goto out_discard;
+ if (dccp_qpolicy_full(sk)) {
+ rc = -EAGAIN;
+ goto out_discard;
+ }
+
dccp_qpolicy_push(sk, skb);
/*
* The xmit_timer is set if the TX CCID is rate-based and will expire
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists