netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/9] vmci/vsock: use 'target' in notify_poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:29:42 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>,
        Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>,
        Rajesh Jalisatgi <rjalisatgi@...are.com>,
        Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
        VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        "haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "sthemmin@...rosoft.com" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/9] vmci/vsock: use 'target' in notify_poll_in, callback

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 2:22 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> @Jorgen can you take a look at this series, especially this patch?

Jorgen's email bounced back, so I'm CCing VMCI maintainers.

Bryan, Rajesh, Vishnu, can you take a look?

Thanks,
Stefano

>
> Maybe we need to update the comments in the else branch, something like
> s/there is nothing/there is not enough data
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 08:01:01AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >This callback controls setting of POLLIN,POLLRDNORM output bits of poll()
> >syscall,but in some cases,it is incorrectly to set it, when socket has
> >at least 1 bytes of available data. Use 'target' which is already exists
> >and equal to sk_rcvlowat in this case.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
> >---
> > net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c        | 2 +-
> > net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
> >index d69fc4b595ad..1684b85b0660 100644
> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
> >@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ vmci_transport_notify_pkt_poll_in(struct sock *sk,
> > {
> >       struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> >
> >-      if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk)) {
> >+      if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= target) {
> >               *data_ready_now = true;
> >       } else {
> >               /* We can't read right now because there is nothing in the
> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
> >index 0f36d7c45db3..a40407872b53 100644
> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
> >@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ vmci_transport_notify_pkt_poll_in(struct sock *sk,
> > {
> >       struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> >
> >-      if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk)) {
> >+      if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= target) {
> >               *data_ready_now = true;
> >       } else {
> >               /* We can't read right now because there is nothing in the
> >--
> >2.25.1