netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V3 1/3] sched/topology: Add NUMA-based CPUs spread API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220728082349.2ba6deae@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jul 2022 08:23:49 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 1/3] sched/topology: Add NUMA-based CPUs
 spread API

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 19:23:37 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> +static inline void sched_cpus_set_spread(int node, u16 *cpus, int ncpus)
> +{
> +}

I was going to poke Peter again, but before doing that - shouldn't we
memset() the cpus here? Just to keep the semantics that the array is
always initialized?