lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220728191630.wjmm4mfbhrvbolqq@skbuf>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:16:30 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
        Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@....com>,
        "upstream@...ihalf.com" <upstream@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH v3 6/8] net: core: switch to
 fwnode_find_net_device_by_node()

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 06:56:48PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> There was a regression even for OF in v1, but after switching to
> device_match_fwnode() it works indeed. Anyway patch v4 is imo useful,
> I'll only reword the commit message.

Do you mean patch 4 or patch v4? If patch 4, of course it's useful, but
not for avoiding a regression with OF (case in which I drop all my claims
made earlier about fw_find_net_device_by_node), but rather to actually
get something working with actual ACPI (although perhaps not in this
series, you'll need to add ACPI IDs in the mv88e6xxx driver some time
later as well, maybe you could focus this series just on converting DSA
to play nice with fwnodes). If you're already thinking about the v4 of
this patch set, I'll respond to that in a separate email shortly.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ