[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YuPNvr9RkaJoZdRg@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 15:08:30 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alvin __ipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] software node: allow named software node to
be created
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:18:00AM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 23:48:21 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:39:42PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 22:24:09 +0300
> > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
...
> > > 2. even if there was a problem with name collision, I think the place
> > > that needs to be fixed is swnode system. What use are swnodes if
> > > they cannot be used like this?
> >
> > Precisely, that's why I don't want to introduce an API that needs to be fixed.
>
> Aha, so you want to ensure that root swnodes are created with unique
> name?
>
> Can't we just make it so that named software node must have a parent?
That's my proposal, but it might have a downside effect on the existing users
(chtwc_int33fe).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists