[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH7PR21MB3263E741EA5AA017A2AB5602CE999@PH7PR21MB3263.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 21:20:05 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"shiraz.saleem@...el.com" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Ajay Sharma <sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v4 03/12] net: mana: Handle vport sharing between devices
> > the Mellanox NICs implement the RAW_QP. IMHO, it's better to have the
> > user explicitly decide whether to use Ethernet or RDMA RAW_QP on a
> > specific port.
>
> It should all be carefully documented someplace.
The use case for RAW_QP is from user-mode. Is it acceptable that we document the detailed usage in rdma-core?
Long
Powered by blists - more mailing lists