netdev - Re: Meson GXL and Rockchip PHY based on same IP?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88d6ef05-f77a-57a2-f34a-e3998a8d70d4@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 30 Jul 2022 21:31:09 +0200
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Meson GXL and Rockchip PHY based on same IP?

On 30.07.2022 19:06, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi Heiner,
> 
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 5:59 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Meson GXL and Rockchip ethernet PHY drivers have quite something in common.
>> They share a number of non-standard registers, using the same bits
>> and same bank handling. This makes me think they they may be using
>> the same IP. However they have different quirk handling. But this
>> doesn't rule out that actually they would need the same quirk handling.
> You made me curious and I found the following public Microchip
> LAN83C185 datasheet: [0]
> Page 27 has a "SMI REGISTER MAPPING" which matches the definitions in
> meson-gxl.c.
> Also on page 33 the interrupt source bits are a 100% match with the
> INTSRC_* marcos in meson-gxl.c
> 
Great, thanks for investigating!

> Whether this means that:
> - Amlogic SoCs embed a LAN83C185
> - LAN83C185 is based on the same IP core (possibly not even designed
> by Amlogic or SMSC)
> - the SMI interface design is something that one hardware engineer
> brought from one company to another
> - ...something else
> is something I can't tell
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Martin
> 
> 
> [0] https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/LAN83C185-Data-Sheet-DS00002808A.pdf