[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <428fe2c1-3c70-5ae8-efcb-1e4a0426a972@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 19:54:54 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>,
René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mediatek,mt7530:
completely rework binding
On 30/07/2022 10:24, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 27.07.2022 13:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/07/2022 14:24, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> Completely rework the binding for MediaTek MT7530 and MT7531 switches.
>>
>> Rules are the same for schema as for driver - one patch, one thing. You
>> mix here trivial style changes (removal of quotes) with functional stuff.
>>
>> Patch is unreviewable, so it must be split.
>
> Thank you. I'm going to split it this way:
> - Trivial changes; fix title and property descriptions, remove quotes,
> add me as maintainer, etc.
> - Update binding description
> - Update json-schema for compatible devices
> - Update examples
>
> Let me know if you have any objections.
Depends what are these "udpates". One logical change = one patch. Adding
compatible in one patch and then adding example for it, is not correct.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists