netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net 0/4] Make DSA work with bonding's ARP monitor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Aug 2022 23:39:00 +0000
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>,
        Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 0/4] Make DSA work with bonding's ARP monitor

On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 10:58:53AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> We can just tell Greg to pull them in after the patches appear in
> Linus's tree, right? Or are there extra acrobatics required I missed?

I forget what I was thinking of with the request for help. We can tell
Greg, but I'll have to prepare adapted patches for linux-5.15.y and
linux-5.10.y anyway, since these ones won't apply.

> BTW we could potentially also revert a31d27fbed5d ("tun: fix bonding
> active backup with arp monitoring") given we revert veth.

We could; though as I didn't notice that and as it doesn't bother
anybody we could also do it separately in net (skipping backports).