[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220801201833.79dd5171@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 20:18:33 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Use different get_trend()
callbacks for different thermal zones"
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 11:13:36 +0000 Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> > This reverts commit 2dc2f760052da4925482ecdcdc5c94d4a599153c.
> >
> > As discussed in the thread:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-
> > bff366c8aeba@...aro.org/
> >
> > the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is
> > actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling device
> > state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless.
> >
> > No conflict happened when reverting the patch.
>
> I am sorry, I didn't run emulation yet to validate this change.
> Will do it in tomorrow and will send ACK if it is OK.
We'll also need a rebase on top of net-next, the patch as is does not
apply to either of the networking trees.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists