netdev - Re: [PATCH v15 mfd 9/9] mfd: ocelot: add support for the vsc7512 chip via spi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yuqw5+lLh65flC4D@euler>
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 10:31:19 -0700
From:   Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, katie.morris@...advantage.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 mfd 9/9] mfd: ocelot: add support for the vsc7512
 chip via spi

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 07:10:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 5:56 PM Colin Foster
> <colin.foster@...advantage.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 01:45:04PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 7:48 AM Colin Foster
> > > <colin.foster@...advantage.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > +       regmap_config.max_register = res->end - res->start;
> > >
> > > Hmm... First of all, resource_size() is for that (with - 1 to the
> > > result). But don't you need to use stride in the calculations?
> >
> > DEFINE_RES_NAMED populates the resource .end with (_start) + (_size) - 1
> > so I don't think resource_size is correct to use here.
> 
> Have you read what I put in parentheses? Basically it becomes very
> well the same as a result, but in a cleaner manner (you calculate
> resource size - 1 which will be exactly the last byte offset of the
> register file), no?

Ahh... I see your point. I agree with your suggestion and will clean it
up.

> 
> > reg_stride gets handled at the top of regmap_read(), so I don't think
> > that's really needed either.
> 
> Okay.
> 
> > For reference:
> >
> > #define VSC7512_DEVCPU_ORG_RES_START    0x71000000
> > #define VSC7512_DEVCPU_ORG_RES_SIZE     0x38
> 
> Right, for 0x38 you supply 0x37, which is exactly resource_size() - 1.
> 
> > # cat range
> > 0-34
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko