[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220804110945.08c5d58b@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 11:09:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Adel Abouchaev <adel.abushaev@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/6] net: Documentation on QUIC kernel Tx crypto.
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 10:00:37 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:58 AM Adel Abouchaev <adel.abushaev@...il.com> wrote:
> > Looking at
> > https://github.com/shemminger/iproute2/blob/main/misc/ss.c#L589 the ss.c
> > still uses proc/.
>
> Only for legacy reasons.
That but in all honesty also the fact that a proc file is pretty easy
and self-describing while the historic netlink families are undocumented
code salads.
> ss -t for sure will use netlink first, then fallback to /proc
>
> New counters should use netlink, please.
Just to be sure I'm not missing anything - we're talking about some
new netlink, right? Is there an existing place for "overall prot family
stats" over netlink today?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists