netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v2 0/4] Add PTP support for CN10K silicon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220804090606.0c892e51@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:06:06 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc:     Naveen Mamindlapalli <naveenm@...vell.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sgoutham@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 0/4] Add PTP support for CN10K silicon

On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 20:08:50 -0700 Richard Cochran wrote:
> > Oh, well. These will have to wait until after the merge window then :(  
> 
> FWIW - I'm okay with any PTP patches that are about specific hardware
> drivers.  When I can, I'll review them for proper use of the core
> layer, locking, etc, but at the end of the day, only the people
> holding the data sheet know how to talk to the hardware.
> 
> Patches that touch the core layer are another story.  These need
> careful review by me and other.  (Obviously)

I was hoping you could cast an eye over the 1-step implementation here.
Giving the device a random time reference along the packet looks odd.
Unfortunately I don't have much (any?) experience with 1-step myself so
I can't trust my own judgment all that much.