netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 24/26] thermal/drivers/cxgb4: Use generic thermal_zone_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:58:26 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "open list:CXGB4 ETHERNET DRIVER (CXGB4)" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 24/26] thermal/drivers/cxgb4: Use generic
 thermal_zone_get_trip() function

On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 23:48:02 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > Are you targeting 6.0 with these or should we pick it up for 6.1 via
> > netdev? I didn't see any notes on merging in the cover letter.  
> 
> Right, if it can go through the thermal tree, all the changes will be in 
> the same place, that will help

Would you be able to send them as a PR so we can also pull it in?
cxgb4 is not that active but why risk a conflict if we're starting
with a clean merge window slate. 

Either way:

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>