lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:51:00 -0700
From:   Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth 2022-08-05

Hi Jakub,

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 2:36 PM Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<luiz.dentz@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 2:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:38:25 -0700 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > > > Did you end up switching to the no-rebase/pull-back model or are you
> > > > still rebasing?
> > >
> > > Still rebasing, I thought that didn't make any difference as long as
> > > the patches apply.
> >
> > Long term the non-rebasing model is probably better since it'd be great
> > for the bluetooth tree to be included in linux-next.
>
> You mean that bluetooth-next would be pulled directly into linux-next
> rather than net-next?
>
> > Since you haven't started using that model, tho, would you mind
> > repairing the Fixes tags in this PR? :)
>
> Let me fix them.

Is there a script or something which can be used to verify the Fix
tags? Or you can actually tell me what are the hashes that appear not
to be on net.

> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz



-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists