lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Aug 2022 09:56:40 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com>,
        George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>,
        Andy King <acking@...are.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] vsock: Set socket state back to
 SS_UNCONNECTED in vsock_connect_timeout()

On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 02:00:46AM -0700, Peilin Ye wrote:
>From: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com>
>
>Imagine two non-blocking vsock_connect() requests on the same socket.
>The first request schedules @connect_work, and after it times out,
>vsock_connect_timeout() sets *sock* state back to TCP_CLOSE, but keeps
>*socket* state as SS_CONNECTING.
>
>Later, the second request returns -EALREADY, meaning the socket "already
>has a pending connection in progress", even if the first request has
>already timed out.
>
>As suggested by Stefano, fix it by setting *socket* state back to
>SS_UNCONNECTED, so that the second request will return -ETIMEDOUT.
>
>Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
>Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com>
>---
>(new patch in v2)

Thanks for sending this :-)

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists