netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add BPF-helper for accessing CLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZmoEn+ARbW+mt4k=68+YJqkUELAFPMAjHN893YL3B9OA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:28:40 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add BPF-helper for accessing CLOCK_TAI

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 11:40 PM Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed Aug 03 2022, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >> +void test_tai(void)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct __sk_buff skb = {
> >> +               .tstamp = 0,
> >> +               .hwtstamp = 0,
> >> +       };
> >> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
> >> +               .data_in = &pkt_v4,
> >> +               .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
> >> +               .ctx_in = &skb,
> >> +               .ctx_size_in = sizeof(skb),
> >> +               .ctx_out = &skb,
> >> +               .ctx_size_out = sizeof(skb),
> >> +       );
> >> +       struct timespec now_tai;
> >> +       struct bpf_object *obj;
> >> +       int ret, prog_fd;
> >> +
> >> +       ret = bpf_prog_test_load("./test_tai.o",
> >> +                                BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj, &prog_fd);
> >
> > it would be best to rely on BPF skeleton, please see other tests
> > including *.skel.h, thanks
> >
>
> Ah, nice. Adjusted the test case accordingly. Will post v2 after the
> merge window. Thanks!

We don't close bpf-next during the merge window, so feel free to send v2 early.