lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <xhsmhtu6kbckc.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:46:59 +0100 From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com> To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 1/3] sched/topology: Add NUMA-based CPUs spread API On 09/08/22 18:36, Valentin Schneider wrote: > On 09/08/22 17:04, Tariq Toukan wrote: >> LGTM. >> How do you suggest to proceed? >> You want to formalize it? Or should I take it from here? >> > > I need to have a think (feel free to ponder and share your thoughts as > well) - I'm happy to push something if I get a brain-wave, but don't let > that hold you back either. This is the form that I hate the least, what do you think?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists