netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 46/93] ipv6/addrconf: fix timing bug in tempaddr regen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220811154237.1531313-46-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:41:40 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sam Edwards <cfsworks@...il.com>, Sam Edwards <CFSworks@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 46/93] ipv6/addrconf: fix timing bug in tempaddr regen

From: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 778964f2fdf05e5d2e6ca9bc3f450b3db454ba9c ]

The addrconf_verify_rtnl() function uses a big if/elseif/elseif/... block
to categorize each address by what type of attention it needs.  An
about-to-expire (RFC 4941) temporary address is one such category, but the
previous elseif branch catches addresses that have already run out their
prefered_lft.  This means that if addrconf_verify_rtnl() fails to run in
the necessary time window (i.e. REGEN_ADVANCE time units before the end of
the prefered_lft), the temporary address will never be regenerated, and no
temporary addresses will be available until each one's valid_lft runs out
and manage_tempaddrs() begins anew.

Fix this by moving the entire temporary address regeneration case out of
that block.  That block is supposed to implement the "destructive" part of
an address's lifecycle, and regenerating a fresh temporary address is not,
semantically speaking, actually tied to any particular lifecycle stage.
The age test is also changed from `age >= prefered_lft - regen_advance`
to `age + regen_advance >= prefered_lft` instead, to ensure no underflow
occurs if the system administrator increases the regen_advance to a value
greater than the already-set prefered_lft.

Note that this does not fix the problem of addrconf_verify_rtnl() sometimes
not running in time, resulting in the race condition described in RFC 4941
section 3.4 - it only ensures that the address is regenerated.  Fixing THAT
problem may require either using jiffies instead of seconds for all time
arithmetic here, or always rounding up when regen_advance is converted to
seconds.

Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623181103.7033-1-CFSworks@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 3b47c901c832..01e3900dd2f8 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -4522,6 +4522,39 @@ static void addrconf_verify_rtnl(struct net *net)
 			/* We try to batch several events at once. */
 			age = (now - ifp->tstamp + ADDRCONF_TIMER_FUZZ_MINUS) / HZ;
 
+			if ((ifp->flags&IFA_F_TEMPORARY) &&
+			    !(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE) &&
+			    ifp->prefered_lft != INFINITY_LIFE_TIME &&
+			    !ifp->regen_count && ifp->ifpub) {
+				/* This is a non-regenerated temporary addr. */
+
+				unsigned long regen_advance = ifp->idev->cnf.regen_max_retry *
+					ifp->idev->cnf.dad_transmits *
+					max(NEIGH_VAR(ifp->idev->nd_parms, RETRANS_TIME), HZ/100) / HZ;
+
+				if (age + regen_advance >= ifp->prefered_lft) {
+					struct inet6_ifaddr *ifpub = ifp->ifpub;
+					if (time_before(ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ, next))
+						next = ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ;
+
+					ifp->regen_count++;
+					in6_ifa_hold(ifp);
+					in6_ifa_hold(ifpub);
+					spin_unlock(&ifp->lock);
+
+					spin_lock(&ifpub->lock);
+					ifpub->regen_count = 0;
+					spin_unlock(&ifpub->lock);
+					rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+					ipv6_create_tempaddr(ifpub, true);
+					in6_ifa_put(ifpub);
+					in6_ifa_put(ifp);
+					rcu_read_lock_bh();
+					goto restart;
+				} else if (time_before(ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ - regen_advance * HZ, next))
+					next = ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ - regen_advance * HZ;
+			}
+
 			if (ifp->valid_lft != INFINITY_LIFE_TIME &&
 			    age >= ifp->valid_lft) {
 				spin_unlock(&ifp->lock);
@@ -4555,35 +4588,6 @@ static void addrconf_verify_rtnl(struct net *net)
 					in6_ifa_put(ifp);
 					goto restart;
 				}
-			} else if ((ifp->flags&IFA_F_TEMPORARY) &&
-				   !(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE)) {
-				unsigned long regen_advance = ifp->idev->cnf.regen_max_retry *
-					ifp->idev->cnf.dad_transmits *
-					max(NEIGH_VAR(ifp->idev->nd_parms, RETRANS_TIME), HZ/100) / HZ;
-
-				if (age >= ifp->prefered_lft - regen_advance) {
-					struct inet6_ifaddr *ifpub = ifp->ifpub;
-					if (time_before(ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ, next))
-						next = ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ;
-					if (!ifp->regen_count && ifpub) {
-						ifp->regen_count++;
-						in6_ifa_hold(ifp);
-						in6_ifa_hold(ifpub);
-						spin_unlock(&ifp->lock);
-
-						spin_lock(&ifpub->lock);
-						ifpub->regen_count = 0;
-						spin_unlock(&ifpub->lock);
-						rcu_read_unlock_bh();
-						ipv6_create_tempaddr(ifpub, true);
-						in6_ifa_put(ifpub);
-						in6_ifa_put(ifp);
-						rcu_read_lock_bh();
-						goto restart;
-					}
-				} else if (time_before(ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ - regen_advance * HZ, next))
-					next = ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ - regen_advance * HZ;
-				spin_unlock(&ifp->lock);
 			} else {
 				/* ifp->prefered_lft <= ifp->valid_lft */
 				if (time_before(ifp->tstamp + ifp->prefered_lft * HZ, next))
-- 
2.35.1