[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220812165756.dxaqy3go567prr5s@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:57:56 +0000
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
songmuchun@...edance.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 13/15] mm, memcg: Add new helper get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:18:38PM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote:
> Introduce new helper get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup() to get obj_cgroup from
> a specific cgroup.
Can you please add couple of lines on why you need objcg?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1 +
> mm/memcontrol.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 2f0a611..901a921 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -1713,6 +1713,7 @@ static inline void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> int __memcg_kmem_charge_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order);
> void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(struct page *page, int order);
>
> +struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_current(void);
> struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page);
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 618c366..762cffa 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2908,6 +2908,47 @@ static struct obj_cgroup *__get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> return objcg;
> }
>
> +static struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
> +
> + if (memcg_kmem_bypass())
> + return NULL;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return objcg;
> +}
> +
> +struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> +{
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> + struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + css = rcu_dereference(cgrp->subsys[memory_cgrp_id]);
> + if (!css || !css_tryget_online(css)) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + cgroup_put(cgrp);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + cgroup_put(cgrp);
The above put seems out of place and buggy.
> +
> + memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
> + if (!memcg) {
> + css_put(css);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg);
> + css_put(css);
> +
> + return objcg;
> +}
> +
> __always_inline struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_current(void)
> {
> struct obj_cgroup *objcg = NULL;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists