netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:18:50 +0200
From:   Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not
 supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips

On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:11:45PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 04:32:15PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 04:42:34PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:56:01PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > Hm, if we will have any random not support OF property in the switch
> > > > node. We won't be able to warn about it anyway. So, if it is present
> > > > but not supported, we will just ignore it.
> > > > 
> > > > I'll drop this patch.
> > > 
> > > To continue, I think the right way to go about this is to edit the
> > > dt-schema to say that these properties are only applicable to certain
> > > compatible strings, rather than for all. Then due to the
> > > "unevaluatedProperties: false", you'd get the warnings you want, at
> > > validation time.
> > 
> > Hm, with "unevaluatedProperties: false" i have no warnings. Even if I
> > create examples with random strings as properties. Are there some new
> > json libraries i should use?
> 
> Try
> 
> additionalProperties: False

Yes, it works. But in this case I'll do more changes. Just wont to make
sure I do not fix not broken things.

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |