lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:59:12 -0700 From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com> To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, katie.morris@...advantage.com, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 mfd 8/8] mfd: ocelot: add support for the vsc7512 chip via spi On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:35:12PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:19:13AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > > Something is going on that I don't fully understand with <asm/byteorder.h>. > > I don't quite see how ocelot-core is throwing all sorts of errors in x86 > > builds now: > > > > https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/667471/12942993/build_allmodconfig_warn/stderr > > > > Snippet from there: > > > > /home/nipa/nipa/tests/patch/build_32bit/build_32bit.sh: line 21: ccache gcc: command not found > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): > > ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:66:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:29:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:30:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:10: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:16: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:27:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h, ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ...): > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:26:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > > > > > <asm/byteorder.h> was included in both drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c and > > drivers/mfd/ocelot.h previously, though Andy pointed out there didn't > > seem to be any users... and I didn't either. I'm sure there's something > > I must be missing. > > I got similar errors in our internal CI yesterday. Fixed by compiling > sparse from git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/sparse/sparse.git/commit/?id=0e1aae55e49cad7ea43848af5b58ff0f57e7af99 > > The update is also available in the "testing" repo in case you are > running Fedora 35 / 36: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c58b53730f > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2bc333ccac Thanks for the info! I haven't been able to fully recreate the issue locally, those are from kernel test robot. I'll give this a shot if I run into it locally though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists