| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YvtSt0DOAnqCdu6G@TonyMac-Alibaba>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:17:59 +0800
From: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/10] net/smc: allow confirm/delete rkey
response deliver multiplex
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:47:34AM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> We know that all flows except confirm_rkey and delete_rkey are exclusive,
> confirm/delete rkey flows can run concurrently (local and remote).
>
> Although the protocol allows, all flows are actually mutually exclusive
> in implementation, dues to waiting for LLC messages is in serial.
>
> This aggravates the time for establishing or destroying a SMC-R
> connections, connections have to be queued in smc_llc_wait.
>
> We use rtokens or rkey to correlate a confirm/delete rkey message
> with its response.
>
> Before sending a message, we put context with rtokens or rkey into
> wait queue. When a response message received, we wakeup the context
> which with the same rtokens or rkey against the response message.
>
> Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> net/smc/smc_llc.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> net/smc/smc_wr.c | 10 ----
> net/smc/smc_wr.h | 10 ++++
> 3 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
> index 8134c15..b026df2 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey_v2 { /* type 0x29 */
> struct smc_llc_qentry {
> struct list_head list;
> struct smc_link *link;
> + void *private;
> union smc_llc_msg msg;
> };
>
> @@ -479,19 +480,17 @@ int smc_llc_send_confirm_link(struct smc_link *link,
> return rc;
> }
>
> -/* send LLC confirm rkey request */
> -static int smc_llc_send_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *send_link,
> - struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc)
> +/* build LLC confirm rkey request */
> +static int smc_llc_build_confirm_rkey_request(struct smc_link *send_link,
> + struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc,
> + struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv **priv)
> {
> struct smc_llc_msg_confirm_rkey *rkeyllc;
> - struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv *pend;
> struct smc_wr_buf *wr_buf;
> struct smc_link *link;
> int i, rc, rtok_ix;
>
> - if (!smc_wr_tx_link_hold(send_link))
> - return -ENOLINK;
> - rc = smc_llc_add_pending_send(send_link, &wr_buf, &pend);
> + rc = smc_llc_add_pending_send(send_link, &wr_buf, priv);
> if (rc)
> goto put_out;
> rkeyllc = (struct smc_llc_msg_confirm_rkey *)wr_buf;
> @@ -521,25 +520,20 @@ static int smc_llc_send_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *send_link,
> cpu_to_be64((uintptr_t)rmb_desc->cpu_addr) :
> cpu_to_be64((u64)sg_dma_address
> (rmb_desc->sgt[send_link->link_idx].sgl));
> - /* send llc message */
> - rc = smc_wr_tx_send(send_link, pend);
> put_out:
> - smc_wr_tx_link_put(send_link);
> return rc;
> }
>
> -/* send LLC delete rkey request */
> -static int smc_llc_send_delete_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
> - struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc)
> +/* build LLC delete rkey request */
> +static int smc_llc_build_delete_rkey_request(struct smc_link *link,
> + struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc,
> + struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv **priv)
> {
> struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey *rkeyllc;
> - struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv *pend;
> struct smc_wr_buf *wr_buf;
> int rc;
>
> - if (!smc_wr_tx_link_hold(link))
> - return -ENOLINK;
> - rc = smc_llc_add_pending_send(link, &wr_buf, &pend);
> + rc = smc_llc_add_pending_send(link, &wr_buf, priv);
> if (rc)
> goto put_out;
> rkeyllc = (struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey *)wr_buf;
> @@ -548,10 +542,7 @@ static int smc_llc_send_delete_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
> smc_llc_init_msg_hdr(&rkeyllc->hd, link->lgr, sizeof(*rkeyllc));
> rkeyllc->num_rkeys = 1;
> rkeyllc->rkey[0] = htonl(rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx]->rkey);
> - /* send llc message */
> - rc = smc_wr_tx_send(link, pend);
> put_out:
> - smc_wr_tx_link_put(link);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -2023,7 +2014,8 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_response(struct smc_link *link,
> case SMC_LLC_DELETE_RKEY:
> if (flowtype != SMC_LLC_FLOW_RKEY || flow->qentry)
> break; /* drop out-of-flow response */
> - goto assign;
> + __wake_up(&link->lgr->llc_msg_waiter, TASK_NORMAL, 1, qentry);
> + goto free;
> case SMC_LLC_CONFIRM_RKEY_CONT:
> /* not used because max links is 3 */
> break;
> @@ -2032,6 +2024,7 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_response(struct smc_link *link,
> qentry->msg.raw.hdr.common.type);
> break;
> }
> +free:
> kfree(qentry);
> return;
> assign:
> @@ -2191,25 +2184,98 @@ void smc_llc_link_clear(struct smc_link *link, bool log)
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&link->llc_testlink_wrk);
> }
>
> +static int smc_llc_rkey_response_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry,
> + unsigned int mode, int sync, void *key)
> +{
> + struct smc_llc_qentry *except, *incoming;
> + u8 except_llc_type;
> +
> + /* not a rkey response */
> + if (!key)
> + return 0;
> +
> + except = wq_entry->private;
> + incoming = key;
> +
> + except_llc_type = except->msg.raw.hdr.common.llc_type;
> +
> + /* except LLC MSG TYPE mismatch */
> + if (except_llc_type != incoming->msg.raw.hdr.common.llc_type)
> + return 0;
> +
> + switch (except_llc_type) {
> + case SMC_LLC_CONFIRM_RKEY:
> + if (memcmp(except->msg.confirm_rkey.rtoken, incoming->msg.confirm_rkey.rtoken,
> + sizeof(struct smc_rmb_rtoken) *
> + except->msg.confirm_rkey.rtoken[0].num_rkeys))
> + return 0;
> + break;
> + case SMC_LLC_DELETE_RKEY:
> + if (memcmp(except->msg.delete_rkey.rkey, incoming->msg.delete_rkey.rkey,
> + sizeof(__be32) * except->msg.delete_rkey.num_rkeys))
> + return 0;
> + break;
> + default:
> + panic("invalid except llc msg %d", except_llc_type);
Replace panic with pr_warn?
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* match, save hdr */
> + memcpy(&except->msg.raw.hdr, &incoming->msg.raw.hdr, sizeof(except->msg.raw.hdr));
> +
> + wq_entry->private = except->private;
> + return woken_wake_function(wq_entry, mode, sync, NULL);
> +}
> +
> /* register a new rtoken at the remote peer (for all links) */
> int smc_llc_do_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *send_link,
> struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc)
> {
> + long timeout = SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME;
Reverse Christmas trees.
> struct smc_link_group *lgr = send_link->lgr;
> - struct smc_llc_qentry *qentry = NULL;
> - int rc = 0;
> + struct smc_llc_qentry qentry;
> + struct smc_wr_tx_pend *pend;
> + struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv *priv;
> + DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, smc_llc_rkey_response_wake_function);
> + int rc = 0, flags;
Ditto.
>
> - rc = smc_llc_send_confirm_rkey(send_link, rmb_desc);
> + if (!smc_wr_tx_link_hold(send_link))
> + return -ENOLINK;
> +
> + rc = smc_llc_build_confirm_rkey_request(send_link, rmb_desc, &priv);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
> - /* receive CONFIRM RKEY response from server over RoCE fabric */
> - qentry = smc_llc_wait(lgr, send_link, SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME,
> - SMC_LLC_CONFIRM_RKEY);
> - if (!qentry || (qentry->msg.raw.hdr.flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RKEY_NEG))
> +
> + pend = container_of(priv, struct smc_wr_tx_pend, priv);
> + /* make a copy of send msg */
> + memcpy(&qentry.msg.confirm_rkey, send_link->wr_tx_bufs[pend->idx].raw,
> + sizeof(qentry.msg.confirm_rkey));
> +
> + qentry.private = wait.private;
> + wait.private = &qentry;
> +
> + add_wait_queue(&lgr->llc_msg_waiter, &wait);
> +
> + /* send llc message */
> + rc = smc_wr_tx_send(send_link, priv);
> + smc_wr_tx_link_put(send_link);
> + if (rc) {
> + remove_wait_queue(&lgr->llc_msg_waiter, &wait);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + while (!signal_pending(current) && timeout) {
> + timeout = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
> + if (qentry.msg.raw.hdr.flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + remove_wait_queue(&lgr->llc_msg_waiter, &wait);
> + flags = qentry.msg.raw.hdr.flags;
> +
> + if (!(flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP) || flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RKEY_NEG)
> rc = -EFAULT;
> out:
> - if (qentry)
> - smc_llc_flow_qentry_del(&lgr->llc_flow_lcl);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -2217,26 +2283,52 @@ int smc_llc_do_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *send_link,
> int smc_llc_do_delete_rkey(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
> struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc)
> {
> - struct smc_llc_qentry *qentry = NULL;
> + long timeout = SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME;
> + struct smc_llc_qentry qentry;
> + struct smc_wr_tx_pend *pend;
> struct smc_link *send_link;
> - int rc = 0;
> + struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv *priv;
Reverse Christmas trees.
> + DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, smc_llc_rkey_response_wake_function);
> + int rc = 0, flags;
>
> send_link = smc_llc_usable_link(lgr);
> - if (!send_link)
> + if (!send_link || !smc_wr_tx_link_hold(send_link))
> return -ENOLINK;
>
> - /* protected by llc_flow control */
> - rc = smc_llc_send_delete_rkey(send_link, rmb_desc);
> + rc = smc_llc_build_delete_rkey_request(send_link, rmb_desc, &priv);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
> - /* receive DELETE RKEY response from server over RoCE fabric */
> - qentry = smc_llc_wait(lgr, send_link, SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME,
> - SMC_LLC_DELETE_RKEY);
> - if (!qentry || (qentry->msg.raw.hdr.flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RKEY_NEG))
> +
> + pend = container_of(priv, struct smc_wr_tx_pend, priv);
> + /* make a copy of send msg */
> + memcpy(&qentry.msg.delete_link, send_link->wr_tx_bufs[pend->idx].raw,
> + sizeof(qentry.msg.delete_link));
> +
> + qentry.private = wait.private;
> + wait.private = &qentry;
> +
> + add_wait_queue(&lgr->llc_msg_waiter, &wait);
> +
> + /* send llc message */
> + rc = smc_wr_tx_send(send_link, priv);
> + smc_wr_tx_link_put(send_link);
> + if (rc) {
> + remove_wait_queue(&lgr->llc_msg_waiter, &wait);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + while (!signal_pending(current) && timeout) {
> + timeout = wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
> + if (qentry.msg.raw.hdr.flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + remove_wait_queue(&lgr->llc_msg_waiter, &wait);
> + flags = qentry.msg.raw.hdr.flags;
> +
> + if (!(flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP) || flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RKEY_NEG)
> rc = -EFAULT;
> out:
> - if (qentry)
> - smc_llc_flow_qentry_del(&lgr->llc_flow_lcl);
> return rc;
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_wr.c b/net/smc/smc_wr.c
> index 26f8f24..52af94f 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_wr.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_wr.c
> @@ -37,16 +37,6 @@
> static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(smc_wr_rx_hash, SMC_WR_RX_HASH_BITS);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smc_wr_rx_hash_lock);
>
> -struct smc_wr_tx_pend { /* control data for a pending send request */
> - u64 wr_id; /* work request id sent */
> - smc_wr_tx_handler handler;
> - enum ib_wc_status wc_status; /* CQE status */
> - struct smc_link *link;
> - u32 idx;
> - struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv priv;
> - u8 compl_requested;
> -};
> -
> /******************************** send queue *********************************/
>
> /*------------------------------- completion --------------------------------*/
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_wr.h b/net/smc/smc_wr.h
> index a54e90a..9946ed5 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_wr.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_wr.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,16 @@ struct smc_wr_rx_handler {
> u8 type;
> };
>
> +struct smc_wr_tx_pend { /* control data for a pending send request */
> + u64 wr_id; /* work request id sent */
> + smc_wr_tx_handler handler;
> + enum ib_wc_status wc_status; /* CQE status */
> + struct smc_link *link;
> + u32 idx;
> + struct smc_wr_tx_pend_priv priv;
> + u8 compl_requested;
> +};
> +
> /* Only used by RDMA write WRs.
> * All other WRs (CDC/LLC) use smc_wr_tx_send handling WR_ID implicitly
> */
> --
> 1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists