[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3e2fe6a2b8f4a65a4e28d9d7fddd558@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:03:14 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Kirill Tkhai' <tkhai@...ru>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: Export __receive_fd()
From: Kirill Tkhai
> Sent: 15 August 2022 22:15
>
> This is needed to make receive_fd_user() available in modules, and it will be used in next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...ru>
> ---
> v2: New
> fs/file.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 3bcc1ecc314a..e45d45f1dd45 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -1181,6 +1181,7 @@ int __receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags)
> __receive_sock(file);
> return new_fd;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__receive_fd);
It doesn't seem right (to me) to be exporting a function
with a __ prefix.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists