[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <592636.1660680066@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 21:01:06 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix suspicious RCU usage in bpf_sk_reuseport_detach()
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > +__rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags_check(const struct sock *sk,
>
> This name is insanely long now.
I know. 47 chars. Do you have something you'd prefer? Maybe
get_sk_user_data_checked()?
It's a shame C doesn't allow default arguments.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists