[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <892b39d6-85f8-bff5-030d-e21288975572@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:14:59 -0700
From: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>
To: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>, jasowang@...hat.com,
mst@...hat.com
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, parav@...dia.com, xieyongji@...edance.com,
gautam.dawar@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vDPA: conditionally read fields in virtio-net dev
On 8/16/2022 2:08 AM, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 8/16/2022 3:58 PM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/15/2022 6:58 PM, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/16/2022 7:32 AM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/15/2022 2:26 AM, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>>>>> Some fields of virtio-net device config space are
>>>>> conditional on the feature bits, the spec says:
>>>>>
>>>>> "The mac address field always exists
>>>>> (though is only valid if VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC is set)"
>>>>>
>>>>> "max_virtqueue_pairs only exists if VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ
>>>>> or VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS is set"
>>>>>
>>>>> "mtu only exists if VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is set"
>>>>>
>>>>> so we should read MTU, MAC and MQ in the device config
>>>>> space only when these feature bits are offered.
>>>>>
>>>>> For MQ, if both VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ and VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS are
>>>>> not set, the virtio device should have
>>>>> one queue pair as default value, so when userspace querying queue
>>>>> pair numbers,
>>>>> it should return mq=1 than zero.
>>>>>
>>>>> For MTU, if VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is not set, we should not read
>>>>> MTU from the device config sapce.
>>>>> RFC894 <A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over
>>>>> Ethernet Networks>
>>>>> says:"The minimum length of the data field of a packet sent over an
>>>>> Ethernet is 1500 octets, thus the maximum length of an IP datagram
>>>>> sent over an Ethernet is 1500 octets. Implementations are encouraged
>>>>> to support full-length packets"
>>>> Noted there's a typo in the above "The *maximum* length of the data
>>>> field of a packet sent over an Ethernet is 1500 octets ..." and the
>>>> RFC was written 1984.
>>> the spec RFC894 says it is 1500, see <a
>>> href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc894.txt__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!MdgxZjw5sp5Qz-GKfwT1IWcw_L4Jo1-UekuJPFz1UrG3YuqirKz7P9ksdJFh1vB6zHJ7z8Q04fpT0-9jWXCtlWM$">https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc894.txt__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!KVwfun0b1Q59Ajp6O7JrB-BuEBSLyQ9e95oGq1cVG_sQIPDL0whI5frx1EGoQFznmm67RsEeJTrUdfYrmZPRFaM$
>>> </a>
>>>>
>>>> Apparently that is no longer true with the introduction of Jumbo
>>>> size frame later in the 2000s. I'm not sure what is the point of
>>>> mention this ancient RFC. It doesn't say default MTU of any
>>>> Ethernet NIC/switch should be 1500 in either case.
>>> This could be a larger number for sure, we are trying to find out
>>> the min value for Ethernet here, to support 1500 octets, MTU should
>>> be 1500 at least, so I assume 1500 should be the default value for MTU
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> virtio spec says:"The virtio network device is a virtual ethernet
>>>>> card",
>>>> Right,
>>>>> so the default MTU value should be 1500 for virtio-net.
>>>> ... but it doesn't say the default is 1500. At least, not in
>>>> explicit way. Why it can't be 1492 or even lower? In practice, if
>>>> the network backend has a MTU higher than 1500, there's nothing
>>>> wrong for guest to configure default MTU more than 1500.
>>> same as above
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For MAC, the spec says:"If the VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC feature bit is set,
>>>>> the configuration space mac entry indicates the “physical” address
>>>>> of the network card, otherwise the driver would typically
>>>>> generate a random local MAC address." So there is no
>>>>> default MAC address if VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC not set.
>>>>>
>>>>> This commits introduces functions vdpa_dev_net_mtu_config_fill()
>>>>> and vdpa_dev_net_mac_config_fill() to fill MTU and MAC.
>>>>> It also fixes vdpa_dev_net_mq_config_fill() to report correct
>>>>> MQ when _F_MQ is not present.
>>>>>
>>>>> These functions should check devices features than driver
>>>>> features, and struct vdpa_device is not needed as a parameter
>>>>>
>>>>> The test & userspace tool output:
>>>>>
>>>>> Feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU, VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ
>>>>> and VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC can be mask out by hardcode.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, it is challenging to "disable" the related fields
>>>>> in the HW device config space, so let's just assume the values
>>>>> are meaningless if the feature bits are not set.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before this change, when feature bits for RSS, MQ, MTU and MAC
>>>>> are not set, iproute2 output:
>>>>> $vdpa vdpa0: mac 00:e8:ca:11:be:05 link up link_announce false mtu
>>>>> 1500
>>>>> negotiated_features
>>>>>
>>>>> without this commit, function vdpa_dev_net_config_fill()
>>>>> reads all config space fields unconditionally, so let's
>>>>> assume the MAC and MTU are meaningless, and it checks
>>>>> MQ with driver_features, so we don't see max_vq_pairs.
>>>>>
>>>>> After applying this commit, when feature bits for
>>>>> MQ, RSS, MAC and MTU are not set,iproute2 output:
>>>>> $vdpa dev config show vdpa0
>>>>> vdpa0: link up link_announce false max_vq_pairs 1 mtu 1500
>>>>> negotiated_features
>>>>>
>>>>> As explained above:
>>>>> Here is no MAC, because VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC is not set,
>>>>> and there is no default value for MAC. It shows
>>>>> max_vq_paris = 1 because even without MQ feature,
>>>>> a functional virtio-net must have one queue pair.
>>>>> mtu = 1500 is the default value as ethernet
>>>>> required.
>>>>>
>>>>> This commit also add supplementary comments for
>>>>> __virtio16_to_cpu(true, xxx) operations in
>>>>> vdpa_dev_net_config_fill() and vdpa_fill_stats_rec()
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c | 60
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
>>>>> index efb55a06e961..a74660b98979 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c
>>>>> @@ -801,19 +801,44 @@ static int vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_get_dumpit(struct
>>>>> sk_buff *msg, struct netlink_callba
>>>>> return msg->len;
>>>>> }
>>>>> -static int vdpa_dev_net_mq_config_fill(struct vdpa_device *vdev,
>>>>> - struct sk_buff *msg, u64 features,
>>>>> +static int vdpa_dev_net_mq_config_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, u64
>>>>> features,
>>>>> const struct virtio_net_config *config)
>>>>> {
>>>>> u16 val_u16;
>>>>> - if ((features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ)) == 0)
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> + if ((features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ)) == 0 &&
>>>>> + (features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS)) == 0)
>>>>> + val_u16 = 1;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + val_u16 = __virtio16_to_cpu(true,
>>>>> config->max_virtqueue_pairs);
>>>>> - val_u16 = le16_to_cpu(config->max_virtqueue_pairs);
>>>>> return nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP,
>>>>> val_u16);
>>>>> }
>>>>> +static int vdpa_dev_net_mtu_config_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
>>>>> u64 features,
>>>>> + const struct virtio_net_config *config)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + u16 val_u16;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) == 0)
>>>>> + val_u16 = 1500;
>>>> As said, there's no virtio spec defined value for MTU. Please leave
>>>> this field out if feature VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is not negotiated.
>>> same as above
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + val_u16 = __virtio16_to_cpu(true, config->mtu);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU, val_u16);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int vdpa_dev_net_mac_config_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, u64
>>>>> features,
>>>>> + const struct virtio_net_config *config)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if ((features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC)) == 0)
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + return nla_put(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MACADDR,
>>>>> + sizeof(config->mac), config->mac);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +
>>>>> static int vdpa_dev_net_config_fill(struct vdpa_device *vdev,
>>>>> struct sk_buff *msg)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct virtio_net_config config = {};
>>>>> @@ -822,18 +847,16 @@ static int vdpa_dev_net_config_fill(struct
>>>>> vdpa_device *vdev, struct sk_buff *ms
>>>>> vdpa_get_config_unlocked(vdev, 0, &config, sizeof(config));
>>>>> - if (nla_put(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MACADDR,
>>>>> sizeof(config.mac),
>>>>> - config.mac))
>>>>> - return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Assume little endian for now, userspace can tweak this for
>>>>> + * legacy guest support.
>>>> You can leave it as a TODO for kernel (vdpa core limitation), but
>>>> AFAIK there's nothing userspace needs to do to infer the
>>>> endianness. IMHO it's the kernel's job to provide an abstraction
>>>> rather than rely on userspace guessing it.
>>> we have discussed it in another thread, and this comment is
>>> suggested by MST.
>> Can you provide the context or link? It shouldn't work like this,
>> otherwise it is breaking uABI. E.g. how will a legacy/BE supporting
>> kernel/device be backward compatible with older vdpa tool (which has
>> knowledge of this endianness implication/assumption from day one)?
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg837114.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!KVwfun0b1Q59Ajp6O7JrB-BuEBSLyQ9e95oGq1cVG_sQIPDL0whI5frx1EGoQFznmm67RsEeJTrUdfYrGq7Vwjk$
>
> The challenge is that the status filed is virtio16, not le16, so
> le16_to_cpu(xxx) is wrong anyway. However we can not tell whether it
> is a LE or BE device from struct vdpa_device, so for most cases, we
> assume it is LE, and leave this comment.
While the fix is fine, the comment is misleading in giving readers false
hope. This is in vdpa_dev_net_config_fill() the vdpa tool query path,
instead of calls from the VMM dealing with vhost/virtio plumbing
specifics. I think what's missing today in vdpa core is the detection of
guest type (legacy, transitional, or modern) regarding endianness
through F_VERSION_1 and legacy interface access, the latter of which
would need some assistance from VMM for sure. However, the presence of
information via the vdpa tool query is totally orthogonal. I don't get a
good reason for why it has to couple with endianness. How vdpa tool
users space is supposed to tweak it? I don't get it...
-Siwei
>
> Thanks
>>
>> -Siwei
>>
>>>>
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + val_u16 = __virtio16_to_cpu(true, config.status);
>>>>> val_u16 = __virtio16_to_cpu(true, config.status);
>>>>> if (nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_STATUS, val_u16))
>>>>> return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>> - val_u16 = __virtio16_to_cpu(true, config.mtu);
>>>>> - if (nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU, val_u16))
>>>>> - return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>> -
>>>>> features_driver = vdev->config->get_driver_features(vdev);
>>>>> if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg,
>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NEGOTIATED_FEATURES, features_driver,
>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_PAD))
>>>>> @@ -846,7 +869,13 @@ static int vdpa_dev_net_config_fill(struct
>>>>> vdpa_device *vdev, struct sk_buff *ms
>>>>> VDPA_ATTR_PAD))
>>>>> return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>> - return vdpa_dev_net_mq_config_fill(vdev, msg,
>>>>> features_driver, &config);
>>>>> + if (vdpa_dev_net_mac_config_fill(msg, features_device, &config))
>>>>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (vdpa_dev_net_mtu_config_fill(msg, features_device, &config))
>>>>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return vdpa_dev_net_mq_config_fill(msg, features_device,
>>>>> &config);
>>>>> }
>>>>> static int
>>>>> @@ -914,6 +943,11 @@ static int vdpa_fill_stats_rec(struct
>>>>> vdpa_device *vdev, struct sk_buff *msg,
>>>>> }
>>>>> vdpa_get_config_unlocked(vdev, 0, &config, sizeof(config));
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Assume little endian for now, userspace can tweak this for
>>>>> + * legacy guest support.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +
>>>> Ditto.
>>> same as above
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Siwei
>>>>> max_vqp = __virtio16_to_cpu(true, config.max_virtqueue_pairs);
>>>>> if (nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP, max_vqp))
>>>>> return -EMSGSIZE;
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists