[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220817130945.szn6rmqubx5cs7ty@wittgenstein>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:09:45 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org, pshelar@....org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com,
alexander.mikhalitsyn@...tuozzo.com, avagin@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] openvswitch: allow specifying ifindex of
new interfaces
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:49:08PM +0300, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> CRIU currently do not support checkpoint/restore of OVS configurations, but
> there was several requests for it. For example,
> https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/2909
Ah right, I remember that. :)
>
> The main problem is ifindexes of newly created interfaces. We realy need to
> preserve them after restore. Current openvswitch API does not allow to
> specify ifindex. Most of the time we can just create an interface via
> generic netlink requests and plug it into ovs but datapaths (generally any
> OVS_VPORT_TYPE_INTERNAL) can only be created via openvswitch requests which
> do not support selecting ifindex.
>
> This patch allows to do so.
> For new datapaths I decided to use dp_infindex in header as infindex
> because it control ifindex for other requests too.
> For internal vports I reused OVS_VPORT_ATTR_IFINDEX.
>
> The only concern I have is that previously dp_ifindex was not used for
> OVS_DP_VMD_NEW requests and some software may not set it to zero. However
> we have been running this patch at Virtuozzo for 2 years and have not
> encountered this problem. Not sure if it is worth to add new
> ovs_datapath_attr instead.
>
>
> As a broader solution, another generic approach is possible: modify
> __dev_change_net_namespace() to allow changing ifindexes within the same
> netns. Yet we will still need to ignore NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL and I am not
> sure that all its users are ready for ifindex change.
I think that might become confusing. We already have issues - even with
the tracking infrastucture - to keep track of ifindex changes when a
network device is moved between network namespaces multiple times. So
I'd rather not make it possible to change the ifindex at will within the
same network namespace though I understand the appeal for CRIU.
> This will be indeed better for CRIU so we won't need to change every SDN
> module to be able to checkpoint/restore it. And probably avoid some bloat.
> What do you think of this?
>
> Andrey Zhadchenko (1):
> openvswitch: allow specifying ifindex of new interfaces
>
> include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h | 4 ++++
> net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> net/openvswitch/vport-internal_dev.c | 1 +
> net/openvswitch/vport.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists