| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <83ffb6f998ca4e9de7c458fa4cf932b53b34e199.1660747162.git.petrm@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:28:25 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@...nel.org>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
<mlxsw@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge
From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>
Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of
the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs
to be routed will ingress the router block.
For VLAN-unaware bridges (802.1D), the FID classification is done according
to {Port, VID}. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, all the existing
{Port, VID}->FID mappings should be updated by the software with the new
RIF. In addition, when a new mapping is added for FID which already has a
RIF, the correct RIF should be used for it.
Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after {Port, VID}->FID
classification, regardless of the order of the configuration.
# ./ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
TEST: Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping [ OK ]
TEST: Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF [ OK ]
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
---
.../drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh | 264 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 264 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..df2b09966886
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+# Test routing over bridge and verify that the order of configuration does not
+# impact switch behavior. Verify that RIF is added correctly for existing
+# mappings and that new mappings use the correct RIF.
+
+# +-------------------+ +--------------------+
+# | H1 | | H2 |
+# | | | |
+# | $h1.10 + | | + $h2.10 |
+# | 192.0.2.1/28 | | | | 192.0.2.3/28 |
+# | | | | | |
+# | $h1 + | | + $h2 |
+# +----------------|--+ +--|-----------------+
+# | |
+# +----------------|-------------------------|-----------------+
+# | SW | | |
+# | +--------------|-------------------------|---------------+ |
+# | | $swp1 + + $swp2 | |
+# | | | | | |
+# | | $swp1.10 + + $swp2.10 | |
+# | | | |
+# | | br0 | |
+# | | 192.0.2.2/28 | |
+# | +--------------------------------------------------------+ |
+# | |
+# | $swp3.10 + |
+# | 192.0.2.17/28 | |
+# | | |
+# | $swp3 + |
+# +---------------|--------------------------------------------+
+# |
+# +---------------|--+
+# | $h3 + |
+# | | |
+# | $h3.10 + |
+# | 192.0.2.18/28 |
+# | |
+# | H3 |
+# +------------------+
+
+lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../net/forwarding
+
+ALL_TESTS="
+ port_vid_map_rif
+ rif_port_vid_map
+"
+
+NUM_NETIFS=6
+source $lib_dir/lib.sh
+source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh
+source $lib_dir/devlink_lib.sh
+
+h1_create()
+{
+ simple_if_init $h1
+ vlan_create $h1 10 v$h1 192.0.2.1/28
+
+ ip route add 192.0.2.16/28 vrf v$h1 nexthop via 192.0.2.2
+}
+
+h1_destroy()
+{
+ ip route del 192.0.2.16/28 vrf v$h1 nexthop via 192.0.2.2
+
+ vlan_destroy $h1 10
+ simple_if_fini $h1
+}
+
+h2_create()
+{
+ simple_if_init $h2
+ vlan_create $h2 10 v$h2 192.0.2.3/28
+}
+
+h2_destroy()
+{
+ vlan_destroy $h2 10
+ simple_if_fini $h2
+}
+
+h3_create()
+{
+ simple_if_init $h3
+ vlan_create $h3 10 v$h3 192.0.2.18/28
+
+ ip route add 192.0.2.0/28 vrf v$h3 nexthop via 192.0.2.17
+}
+
+h3_destroy()
+{
+ ip route del 192.0.2.0/28 vrf v$h3 nexthop via 192.0.2.17
+
+ vlan_destroy $h3 10
+ simple_if_fini $h3
+}
+
+switch_create()
+{
+ ip link set dev $swp1 up
+
+ ip link add dev br0 type bridge mcast_snooping 0
+
+ # By default, a link-local address is generated when netdevice becomes
+ # up. Adding an address to the bridge will cause creating a RIF for it.
+ # Prevent generating link-local address to be able to control when the
+ # RIF is added.
+ sysctl_set net.ipv6.conf.br0.addr_gen_mode 1
+ ip link set dev br0 up
+
+ ip link set dev $swp2 up
+ vlan_create $swp2 10
+ ip link set dev $swp2.10 master br0
+
+ ip link set dev $swp3 up
+ vlan_create $swp3 10 "" 192.0.2.17/28
+ tc qdisc add dev $swp3 clsact
+
+ # Replace neighbor to avoid 1 packet which is forwarded in software due
+ # to "unresolved neigh".
+ ip neigh replace dev $swp3.10 192.0.2.18 lladdr $(mac_get $h3.10)
+}
+
+switch_destroy()
+{
+ tc qdisc del dev $swp3 clsact
+ vlan_destroy $swp3 10
+ ip link set dev $swp3 down
+
+ ip link set dev $swp2.10 nomaster
+ vlan_destroy $swp2 10
+ ip link set dev $swp2 down
+
+ ip link set dev br0 down
+ sysctl_restore net.ipv6.conf.br0.addr_gen_mode
+ ip link del dev br0
+
+ ip link set dev $swp1 down
+}
+
+setup_prepare()
+{
+ h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
+ swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
+
+ swp2=${NETIFS[p3]}
+ h2=${NETIFS[p4]}
+
+ swp3=${NETIFS[p5]}
+ h3=${NETIFS[p6]}
+
+ vrf_prepare
+ forwarding_enable
+
+ h1_create
+ h2_create
+ h3_create
+
+ switch_create
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+ pre_cleanup
+
+ switch_destroy
+
+ h3_destroy
+ h2_destroy
+ h1_destroy
+
+ forwarding_restore
+ vrf_cleanup
+}
+
+bridge_rif_add()
+{
+ rifs_occ_t0=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+ __addr_add_del br0 add 192.0.2.2/28
+ rifs_occ_t1=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+
+ expected_rifs=$((rifs_occ_t0 + 1))
+
+ [[ $expected_rifs -eq $rifs_occ_t1 ]]
+ check_err $? "Expected $expected_rifs RIFs, $rifs_occ_t1 are used"
+
+ sleep 1
+}
+
+bridge_rif_del()
+{
+ __addr_add_del br0 del 192.0.2.2/28
+}
+
+port_vid_map_rif()
+{
+ RET=0
+
+ # First add {port, VID}->FID for $swp1.10, then add a RIF and verify
+ # that packets can be routed via the existing mapping.
+ vlan_create $swp1 10
+ ip link set dev $swp1.10 master br0
+ bridge_rif_add
+
+ # The hardware matches on the first ethertype which is not VLAN,
+ # so the protocol should be IP.
+ tc filter add dev $swp3 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.18 action pass
+
+ ping_do $h1.10 192.0.2.18
+ check_err $? "Ping failed"
+
+ tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp3 egress" 101 10
+ check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+ log_test "Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping"
+
+ tc filter del dev $swp3 egress
+
+ bridge_rif_del
+ ip link set dev $swp1.10 nomaster
+ vlan_destroy $swp1 10
+}
+
+rif_port_vid_map()
+{
+ RET=0
+
+ # First add an address to the bridge, which will create a RIF on top of
+ # it, then add a new {port, VID}->FID mapping and verify that packets
+ # can be routed via the new mapping.
+ bridge_rif_add
+ vlan_create $swp1 10
+ ip link set dev $swp1.10 master br0
+
+ # The hardware matches on the first ethertype which is not VLAN,
+ # so the protocol should be IP.
+ tc filter add dev $swp3 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+ flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.18 action pass
+
+ ping_do $h1.10 192.0.2.18
+ check_err $? "Ping failed"
+
+ tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp3 egress" 101 10
+ check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+ log_test "Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF"
+
+ tc filter del dev $swp3 egress
+
+ ip link set dev $swp1.10 nomaster
+ vlan_destroy $swp1 10
+ bridge_rif_del
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+setup_prepare
+setup_wait
+
+tests_run
+
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists