[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bc73cf7-38d2-e30e-5d68-4a63a9186fd0@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 21:53:39 +0530
From: "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
m.chetan.kumar@...el.com
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, johannes@...solutions.net,
ryazanov.s.a@...il.com, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
krishna.c.sudi@...el.com, linuxwwan@...el.com,
Haijun Liu <haijun.liu@...iatek.com>,
Madhusmita Sahu <madhusmita.sahu@...el.com>,
Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>,
Devegowda Chandrashekar <chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: wwan: t7xx: Infrastructure for early
port configuration
On 8/17/2022 5:40 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, m.chetan.kumar@...el.com wrote:
>
>> From: Haijun Liu <haijun.liu@...iatek.com>
>>
<skip>
>> @@ -372,7 +435,8 @@ static int t7xx_port_proxy_recv_skb(struct cldma_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *s
>>
>> seq_num = t7xx_port_next_rx_seq_num(port, ccci_h);
>> port_conf = port->port_conf;
>> - skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*ccci_h));
>> + if (!port->port_conf->is_early_port)
>> + skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*ccci_h));
>
> This seems to be the only user for is_early_port, wouldn't be more obvious
> to store the header size instead?
Early port doesn't carry header.
If we change it to header size, skb_pull() operators on zero length. OR
may need another such flag to bypass it.
--
Chetan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists