netdev - [PATCH net 4/5] ice: Ignore error message when setting same promiscuous mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220817171329.65285-5-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:13:28 -0700
From:   Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com
Cc:     Benjamin Mikailenko <benjamin.mikailenko@...el.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
        ivecera@...hat.com, Grzegorz Siwik <grzegorz.siwik@...el.com>,
        Gurucharan <gurucharanx.g@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 4/5] ice: Ignore error message when setting same promiscuous mode

From: Benjamin Mikailenko <benjamin.mikailenko@...el.com>

Commit 1273f89578f2 ("ice: Fix broken IFF_ALLMULTI handling")
introduced new checks when setting/clearing promiscuous mode. But if the
requested promiscuous mode setting already exists, an -EEXIST error
message would be printed. This is incorrect because promiscuous mode is
either on/off and shouldn't print an error when the requested
configuration is already set.

This can happen when removing a bridge with two bonded interfaces and
promiscuous most isn't fully cleared from VLAN VSI in hardware.

Fix this by ignoring cases where requested promiscuous mode exists.

Fixes: 1273f89578f2 ("ice: Fix broken IFF_ALLMULTI handling")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Mikailenko <benjamin.mikailenko@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Siwik <grzegorz.siwik@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK8fFZ7m-KR57M_rYX6xZN39K89O=LGooYkKsu6HKt0Bs+x6xQ@mail.gmail.com/
Tested-by: Gurucharan <gurucharanx.g@...el.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fltr.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fltr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fltr.c
index 85a94483c2ed..40e678cfb507 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fltr.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_fltr.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ ice_fltr_set_vlan_vsi_promisc(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_vsi *vsi,
 	int result;
 
 	result = ice_set_vlan_vsi_promisc(hw, vsi->idx, promisc_mask, false);
-	if (result)
+	if (result && result != -EEXIST)
 		dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(pf),
 			"Error setting promisc mode on VSI %i (rc=%d)\n",
 			vsi->vsi_num, result);
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ ice_fltr_clear_vlan_vsi_promisc(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_vsi *vsi,
 	int result;
 
 	result = ice_set_vlan_vsi_promisc(hw, vsi->idx, promisc_mask, true);
-	if (result)
+	if (result && result != -EEXIST)
 		dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(pf),
 			"Error clearing promisc mode on VSI %i (rc=%d)\n",
 			vsi->vsi_num, result);
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ ice_fltr_clear_vsi_promisc(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 vsi_handle, u8 promisc_mask,
 	int result;
 
 	result = ice_clear_vsi_promisc(hw, vsi_handle, promisc_mask, vid);
-	if (result)
+	if (result && result != -EEXIST)
 		dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(pf),
 			"Error clearing promisc mode on VSI %i for VID %u (rc=%d)\n",
 			ice_get_hw_vsi_num(hw, vsi_handle), vid, result);
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ ice_fltr_set_vsi_promisc(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 vsi_handle, u8 promisc_mask,
 	int result;
 
 	result = ice_set_vsi_promisc(hw, vsi_handle, promisc_mask, vid);
-	if (result)
+	if (result && result != -EEXIST)
 		dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(pf),
 			"Error setting promisc mode on VSI %i for VID %u (rc=%d)\n",
 			ice_get_hw_vsi_num(hw, vsi_handle), vid, result);
-- 
2.35.1