netdev - Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone detection"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220817112110.6ad4c3ef@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 11:21:10 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, vadimp@...lanox.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        vadimp@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone
 detection"

On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:11:12 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Jakub, Daniel wants to route this patch via his tree. Do you mind?
> I spoke with Vadim earlier this week and we do not expect changes to
> this file during the current cycle.

I don't understand why this couldn't have gotten in during the merge
window for 6.0, avoiding the risk of conflicts. But yeah, you said
conflicts are unlikely here anyway, so no objections:

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>