[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nUeePn44wi_0J8vP-LE92Ysek_-nTEXAOQWJ+aEVb-KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:54:09 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, ojeda@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
asml.silence@...il.com, imagedong@...cent.com,
luiz.von.dentz@...el.com, vasily.averin@...ux.dev,
jk@...econstruct.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: skb: prevent the split of
kfree_skb_reason() by gcc
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 4:20 AM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Enn...because you pointed out my code's problem, just like what robot do.
> Shouldn't I?
Yeah, but that is just the usual review on a patch; I didn't report
the original bug (that the commit message talks about).
(I appreciate that you wanted to give credit, though :-)
> Okay, I'll wait longer before the next version.
>
> Thanks!
My pleasure!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists