netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Aug 2022 11:09:23 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_andnot()

On 16/08/22 15:24, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 07:07:24PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> for_each_cpu_and() is very convenient as it saves having to allocate a
>> temporary cpumask to store the result of cpumask_and(). The same issue
>> applies to cpumask_andnot() which doesn't actually need temporary storage
>> for iteration purposes.
>>
>> Following what has been done for for_each_cpu_and(), introduce
>> for_each_cpu_andnot().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  lib/cpumask.c           | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> index fe29ac7cc469..a8b2ca160e57 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> @@ -157,6 +157,13 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n,
>>      return n+1;
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_andnot(int n,
>> +					    const struct cpumask *srcp,
>> +					    const struct cpumask *andp)
>> +{
>> +	return n+1;
>> +}
>> +
>
> It looks like the patch is not based on top of 6.0, where UP cpumask
> operations were fixed.  Can you please rebase?
>

Right, this is based on tip/sched/core, I'll rebase it. Sorry about that!