[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yv40FjX9WTx8aBih@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:44:06 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Mattias Forsblad <mattias.forsblad@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 1/3] dsa: Add ability to handle RMU frames.
> +static int dsa_inband_rcv_ll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + int source_device, source_port;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds;
> + u8 *dsa_header;
> + int rcv_seqno;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!dev || !dev->dsa_ptr)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ds = dev->dsa_ptr->ds;
> +
> + dsa_header = skb->data - 2;
> +
> + source_device = dsa_header[0] & 0x1f;
> + source_port = (dsa_header[1] >> 3) & 0x1f;
> + ds = dsa_switch_find(ds->dst->index, source_device);
You should never trust anything you receive from the network. Always
validate it. ds could be a NULL pointer here, if source_device is
bad. source_port could also be invalid. Hum, source port is not
actually used?
We send RMU frames with a specific destination MAC address. Can we
validate the destination address for frames we receive.
> +
> + /* Get rcv seqno */
> + rcv_seqno = dsa_header[3];
> +
> + skb_pull(skb, DSA_HLEN);
> +
> + if (ds->ops && ds->ops->inband_receive(ds, skb, rcv_seqno))
> + netdev_err(dev, "DSA inband: error decoding packet");
rate limit this print, so as to avoid the possibility of a DoS.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists