netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 8/9] net: mscc: ocelot: set up tag_8021q CPU ports independent of user port affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yv+SNHDXrl3KyaRA@euler>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:37:56 -0700
From:   Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 8/9] net: mscc: ocelot: set up tag_8021q CPU
 ports independent of user port affinity

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:06:23AM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:56PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > ERROR: modpost: "ocelot_port_teardown_dsa_8021q_cpu" [drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/mscc_felix.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: modpost: "ocelot_port_teardown_dsa_8021q_cpu" [drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/mscc_seville.ko] undefined!
> 
> Damn, I forgot EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()....
> Since I see you've marked the patches as changes requested already, I'll
> go ahead and resubmit.

Any reason not to use the _NS() variants?