lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:47:07 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>, ipsec-devel <devel@...ux-ipsec.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm-next v2 0/6] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:52:26 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > Let me be very clear - as far as I'm concerned no part of the RDMA > > stack belongs in netdev. What's there is there, but do not try to use > > that argument to justify more stuff. > > > > If someone from the community thinks that I should have interest in > > working on / helping proprietary protocol stacks please let me know, > > because right now I have none. > > No one is asking from you to work on proprietary protocols. That's not what I said. I don't know English grammar enough but you took the modifying (descriptive? genitive?) noun and treated it as the object. I don't want to be in any way disrespectful to the technology you invest your time in. Or argue with any beliefs you have about it. > RoCE is IBTA standard protocol and iWARP is IETF one. They both fully > documented and backed by multiple vendors (Intel, IBM, Mellanox, Cavium > ...). > > There is also interoperability lab https://www.iol.unh.edu/ that runs > various tests. In addition to distro interoperability labs testing. > > I invite you to take a look on Jason's presentation "Challenges of the > RDMA subsystem", which he gave 3 years ago, about RDMA and challenges > with netdev. > https://lpc.events/event/4/contributions/364/ I appreciate the invite, but it's not high enough on my list of interest to spend time on.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists