lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220818193910.50100711@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:39:10 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc:     "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...tuozzo.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] net: neigh: use dev_kfree_skb_irq instead of
 kfree_skb()

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:44:29 +0800 Yang Yingliang wrote:
> On 2022/8/19 0:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Please put [PATCH net] as the tag for v2, this is a fix, not -next
> > material.  
> OK.
> I don't find the commit 66ba215cb513 ("neigh: fix possible DoS due to 
> net iface start/stop loop")

I see where the confusion is coming from. It's too fresh to have made
it to Linus. It's part of this pull request:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220818195549.1805709-1-kuba@kernel.org/

but Linus has not pulled yet.

I believe if something is in the "pending-fixes" branch of linux-next:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/?h=pending-fixes

you can consider it to be an immediate fix, rather than -next material.

Not sure if that makes sense but that's the best I can do explaining
it...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ