[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220818193910.50100711@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:39:10 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...tuozzo.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] net: neigh: use dev_kfree_skb_irq instead of
kfree_skb()
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:44:29 +0800 Yang Yingliang wrote:
> On 2022/8/19 0:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Please put [PATCH net] as the tag for v2, this is a fix, not -next
> > material.
> OK.
> I don't find the commit 66ba215cb513 ("neigh: fix possible DoS due to
> net iface start/stop loop")
I see where the confusion is coming from. It's too fresh to have made
it to Linus. It's part of this pull request:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220818195549.1805709-1-kuba@kernel.org/
but Linus has not pulled yet.
I believe if something is in the "pending-fixes" branch of linux-next:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/?h=pending-fixes
you can consider it to be an immediate fix, rather than -next material.
Not sure if that makes sense but that's the best I can do explaining
it...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists