lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220818195301.27e76539@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:53:01 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...dia.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
        jacob.e.keller@...el.com, vikas.gupta@...adcom.com,
        gospo@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 4/4] net: devlink: expose default flash update
 target

On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:00:42 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Allow driver to mark certain version obtained by info_get() op as
> "flash update default". Expose this information to user which allows him
> to understand what version is going to be affected if he does flash
> update without specifying the component. Implement this in netdevsim.

My intuition would be that if you specify no component you're flashing
the entire device. Is that insufficient? Can you explain the use case?

Also Documentation/ needs to be updated.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ