[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <873EFED7-1FB1-4545-899A-F57378C56FD3@vmware.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 04:46:56 +0000
From: Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
CC: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>,
Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>,
Pv-drivers <Pv-drivers@...are.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"sthemmin@...rosoft.com" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] vmci/vsock: check SO_RCVLOWAT before wake up
reader
> On Aug 8, 2022, at 4:01 AM, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 02:05:52PM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds extra condition to wake up data reader: do it only when number
>> of readable bytes >= SO_RCVLOWAT. Otherwise, there is no sense to kick
>> user,because it will wait until SO_RCVLOWAT bytes will be dequeued.
Nit: add space after comma.
> Ditto as previous patch.
>
> @Bryan, @Vishnu, plaese, can you review/ack also this patch?
This patch looks good to me.
Thank you, Arseniy for running the new test with VMCI. I also ran some
of our internal tests successfully with this patch series.
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c | 2 +-
>> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
>> index 852097e2b9e6..7c3a7db134b2 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
>> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ vmci_transport_handle_wrote(struct sock *sk,
>> struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>> PKT_FIELD(vsk, sent_waiting_read) = false;
>> #endif
>> - sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
>> + vsock_data_ready(sk);
>> }
>>
>> static void vmci_transport_notify_pkt_socket_init(struct sock *sk)
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
>> index 12f0cb8fe998..e96a88d850a8 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
>> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ vmci_transport_handle_wrote(struct sock *sk,
>> bool bottom_half,
>> struct sockaddr_vm *dst, struct sockaddr_vm *src)
>> {
>> - sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
>> + vsock_data_ready(sk);
>> }
>>
>> static void vsock_block_update_write_window(struct sock *sk)
>> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ vmci_transport_notify_pkt_recv_post_dequeue(
>> /* See the comment in
>> * vmci_transport_notify_pkt_send_post_enqueue().
>> */
>> - sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
>> + vsock_data_ready(sk);
>> }
>>
>> return err;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists