lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Message-ID: <00000000000028d96a05e6ba6266@google.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Aug 2022 23:24:28 -0700
From:   syzbot <syzbot+e696806ef96cdd2d87cd@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mkl@...gutronix.de,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, nikolay@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        sgarzare@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in kcm_ioctl

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    95d10484d66e Add linux-next specific files for 20220817
git tree:       linux-next
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11b3b2f3080000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2f5fa747986be53a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e696806ef96cdd2d87cd
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1778e50d080000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1379e5e3080000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e696806ef96cdd2d87cd@...kaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc1-next-20220817-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor769/3613 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801cb5c0f8 ((work_completion)(&strp->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0xdd/0xae0 kernel/workqueue.c:3066

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88801d5b0fb0 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1687 [inline]
ffff88801d5b0fb0 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kcm_attach net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1390 [inline]
ffff88801d5b0fb0 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kcm_attach_ioctl net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1490 [inline]
ffff88801d5b0fb0 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kcm_ioctl+0x396/0x1180 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1696

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_sock_nested+0x36/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3391
       do_strp_work net/strparser/strparser.c:398 [inline]
       strp_work+0x40/0x130 net/strparser/strparser.c:415
       process_one_work+0x991/0x1610 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
       worker_thread+0x665/0x1080 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
       kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306

-> #0 ((work_completion)(&strp->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
       __flush_work+0x105/0xae0 kernel/workqueue.c:3069
       __cancel_work_timer+0x3f9/0x570 kernel/workqueue.c:3160
       strp_done+0x64/0xf0 net/strparser/strparser.c:513
       kcm_attach net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1429 [inline]
       kcm_attach_ioctl net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1490 [inline]
       kcm_ioctl+0x913/0x1180 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1696
       sock_do_ioctl+0xcc/0x230 net/socket.c:1169
       sock_ioctl+0x2f1/0x640 net/socket.c:1286
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(sk_lock-AF_INET6);
                               lock((work_completion)(&strp->work));
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_INET6);
  lock((work_completion)(&strp->work));

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor769/3613:
 #0: ffff88801d5b0fb0 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1687 [inline]
 #0: ffff88801d5b0fb0 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kcm_attach net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1390 [inline]
 #0: ffff88801d5b0fb0 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kcm_attach_ioctl net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1490 [inline]
 #0: ffff88801d5b0fb0 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kcm_ioctl+0x396/0x1180 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1696

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 3613 Comm: syz-executor769 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-next-20220817-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/22/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
 __flush_work+0x105/0xae0 kernel/workqueue.c:3069
 __cancel_work_timer+0x3f9/0x570 kernel/workqueue.c:3160
 strp_done+0x64/0xf0 net/strparser/strparser.c:513
 kcm_attach net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1429 [inline]
 kcm_attach_ioctl net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1490 [inline]
 kcm_ioctl+0x913/0x1180 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1696
 sock_do_ioctl+0xcc/0x230 net/socket.c:1169
 sock_ioctl+0x2f1/0x640 net/socket.c:1286
 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fc907a73f09
Code: 28 c3 e8 2a 14 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc5f76b0d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fc907a73f09
RDX: 00000000200000c0 RSI: 00000000000089e0 RDI: 0000000000000003


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ