[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <919843fbb5b3488f2b5f66edbb49d54ef29e3bf6.1661192455.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:25:53 -0600
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, memxor@...il.com
Cc: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, pablo@...filter.org, fw@...len.de,
toke@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/5] bpf: Use 0 instead of NOT_INIT for btf_struct_access() writes
Returning a bpf_reg_type only makes sense in the context of a BPF_READ.
For writes, prefer to explicitly return 0 for clarity.
Note that is non-functional change as it just so happened that NOT_INIT
== 0.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
---
net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 85a9e500c42d..6da16ae6a962 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int bpf_tcp_ca_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
return -EACCES;
}
- return NOT_INIT;
+ return 0;
}
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_tcp_send_ack, struct tcp_sock *, tp, u32, rcv_nxt)
--
2.37.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists