netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/1] netfilter: flowtable: Fix use after free after freeing flow table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwPw1ZqiiuGdCGeB@salvia>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2022 23:10:45 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>
Cc:     Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] netfilter: flowtable: Fix use after free after
 freeing flow table

Hi Paul,

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 12:23:39PM +0300, Paul Blakey wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> The only functional difference here (for HW table) is your patches call
> flush just for the del workqueue instead of del/stats/add, right?
> 
> Because in the end you do:
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&flow_table->gc_work);
> nf_flow_table_offload_flush(flow_table);
> nf_flow_table_iterate(flow_table, nf_flow_table_do_cleanup, NULL);
> nf_flow_table_gc_run(flow_table);
> nf_flow_table_offload_flush_cleanup(flow_table);
> 
> 
> resulting in the following sequence (after expending flush_cleanup()):
> 
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&flow_table->gc_work);
> nf_flow_table_offload_flush(flow_table);
> nf_flow_table_iterate(flow_table, nf_flow_table_do_cleanup, NULL);
> nf_flow_table_gc_run(flow_table);
> flush_workqueue(nf_flow_offload_del_wq);
> nf_flow_table_gc_run(flowtable);
> 
> 
> Where as my (and Volodymyr's) patch does:
> 
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&flow_table->gc_work);
> nf_flow_table_offload_flush(flow_table);
> nf_flow_table_iterate(flow_table, nf_flow_table_do_cleanup, NULL);
> nf_flow_table_iterate(flow_table, nf_flow_offload_gc_step, NULL);
> nf_flow_table_offload_flush(flow_table);
> nf_flow_table_iterate(flow_table, nf_flow_offload_gc_step, NULL);
> 
> 
> so almost identical, I don't see "extra reiterative calls to flush" here,
> but I'm fine with just your patch as it's more efficient, can we take yours
> to both gits?

Yes, I'll submit them. I'll re-use your patch description.

Maybe I get a Tested-by: tag from you?

Thanks!