Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:14:10 -0400
From:   Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        "haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "sthemmin@...rosoft.com" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>,
        Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
        Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>,
        VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:21:58AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This patchset includes some updates for SO_RCVLOWAT:
> 
> 1) af_vsock:
>    During my experiments with zerocopy receive, i found, that in some
>    cases, poll() implementation violates POSIX: when socket has non-
>    default SO_RCVLOWAT(e.g. not 1), poll() will always set POLLIN and
>    POLLRDNORM bits in 'revents' even number of bytes available to read
>    on socket is smaller than SO_RCVLOWAT value. In this case,user sees
>    POLLIN flag and then tries to read data(for example using  'read()'
>    call), but read call will be blocked, because  SO_RCVLOWAT logic is
>    supported in dequeue loop in af_vsock.c. But the same time,  POSIX
>    requires that:
> 
>    "POLLIN     Data other than high-priority data may be read without
>                blocking.
>     POLLRDNORM Normal data may be read without blocking."
> 
>    See https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/open/n4217.pdf, page 293.
> 
>    So, we have, that poll() syscall returns POLLIN, but read call will
>    be blocked.
> 
>    Also in man page socket(7) i found that:
> 
>    "Since Linux 2.6.28, select(2), poll(2), and epoll(7) indicate a
>    socket as readable only if at least SO_RCVLOWAT bytes are available."
> 
>    I checked TCP callback for poll()(net/ipv4/tcp.c, tcp_poll()), it
>    uses SO_RCVLOWAT value to set POLLIN bit, also i've tested TCP with
>    this case for TCP socket, it works as POSIX required.
> 
>    I've added some fixes to af_vsock.c and virtio_transport_common.c,
>    test is also implemented.
> 
> 2) virtio/vsock:
>    It adds some optimization to wake ups, when new data arrived. Now,
>    SO_RCVLOWAT is considered before wake up sleepers who wait new data.
>    There is no sense, to kick waiter, when number of available bytes
>    in socket's queue < SO_RCVLOWAT, because if we wake up reader in
>    this case, it will wait for SO_RCVLOWAT data anyway during dequeue,
>    or in poll() case, POLLIN/POLLRDNORM bits won't be set, so such
>    exit from poll() will be "spurious". This logic is also used in TCP
>    sockets.
> 
> 3) vmci/vsock:
>    Same as 2), but i'm not sure about this changes. Will be very good,
>    to get comments from someone who knows this code.
> 
> 4) Hyper-V:
>    As Dexuan Cui mentioned, for Hyper-V transport it is difficult to
>    support SO_RCVLOWAT, so he suggested to disable this feature for
>    Hyper-V.
> 
> Thank You

Hi Arseniy,
Stefano will be online again on Monday. I suggest we wait for him to
review this series. If it's urgent, please let me know and I'll take a
look.

Thanks,
Stefan

> Arseniy Krasnov(9):
>  vsock: SO_RCVLOWAT transport set callback
>  hv_sock: disable SO_RCVLOWAT support
>  virtio/vsock: use 'target' in notify_poll_in callback
>  vmci/vsock: use 'target' in notify_poll_in callback
>  vsock: pass sock_rcvlowat to notify_poll_in as target
>  vsock: add API call for data ready
>  virtio/vsock: check SO_RCVLOWAT before wake up reader
>  vmci/vsock: check SO_RCVLOWAT before wake up reader
>  vsock_test: POLLIN + SO_RCVLOWAT test
> 
>  include/net/af_vsock.h                       |   2 +
>  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c                     |  33 +++++++-
>  net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c             |   7 ++
>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c      |   7 +-
>  net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c        |  10 +--
>  net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c |  12 +--
>  tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c             | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
>  Changelog:
> 
>  v1 -> v2:
>  1) Patches for VMCI transport(same as for virtio-vsock).
>  2) Patches for Hyper-V transport(disabling SO_RCVLOWAT setting).
>  3) Waiting logic in test was updated(sleep() -> poll()).
> 
>  v2 -> v3:
>  1) Patches were reordered.
>  2) Commit message updated in 0005.
>  3) Check 'transport' pointer in 0001 for NULL.
> 
>  v3 -> v4:
>  1) vsock_set_rcvlowat() logic changed. Previous version required
>     assigned transport and always called its 'set_rcvlowat' callback
>     (if present). Now, assignment is not needed.
>  2) 0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008 - commit messages updated.
>  3) 0009 - small refactoring and style fixes.
>  4) RFC tag was removed.
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.1

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists