[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220823123121.0ae00393@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:31:21 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...dia.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, vikas.gupta@...adcom.com,
gospo@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 4/4] net: devlink: expose the info about
version representing a component
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:36:01 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 05:01:16AM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
> >I don't think we should add API without a clear use, let's drop this
> >as well.
>
> What do you mean? This just simply lists components that are possible to
> use with devlink dev flash. What is not clear? I don't follow.
Dumping random internal bits of the kernel is not how we create uAPIs.
Again, what is the scenario in which user space needs to know
the flashable component today ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists