lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5174d4ef7fe3928472d5a575c87ee627bfb4c129.camel@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 22:57:01 +0200 From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>, "haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, "sthemmin@...rosoft.com" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>, Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, kernel <kernel@...rdevices.ru>, VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 16:30 -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:18:52PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:14:10 -0400 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > Stefano will be online again on Monday. I suggest we wait for him to > > > review this series. If it's urgent, please let me know and I'll take a > > > look. > > > > It was already applied, sorry about that. But please continue with > > review as if it wasn't. We'll just revert based on Stefano's feedback > > as needed. > > Okay, no problem. For the records, I applied the series since it looked to me Arseniy addressed all the feedback from Stefano on the first patch (the only one still lacking an acked-by/reviewed-by tag) and I thought it would be better avoiding such delay. We are still early in this net-next cycle, I think it can be improved incrementally as needed. Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists