netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 1/4] net: devlink: extend info_get() version put to indicate a flash component

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YwR1GCPCKuK4WJRA@nanopsycho>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:35:04 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...dia.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
        jacob.e.keller@...el.com, vikas.gupta@...adcom.com,
        gospo@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 1/4] net: devlink: extend info_get() version
 put to indicate a flash component

Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 05:00:26AM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:02:44 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> +int devlink_info_version_running_put_ext(struct devlink_info_req *req,
>> +					 const char *version_name,
>> +					 const char *version_value,
>> +					 enum devlink_info_version_type version_type);
>
>Why are we hooking into running, wouldn't stored make more sense?

I think eventually this should be in both. Netdevsim and mlxsw (which I
did this originally for) does not have "stored".